Pretotyping: Validate the Right Idea Before You Build the Wrong One

Introduction

In corporate innovation programs, too many ideas fail—not because they’re executed poorly, but because they shouldn’t have been built in the first place. Time, capital, and internal credibility are lost chasing solutions that customers never wanted.

Pretotyping flips the script. It’s a fast, lightweight method for testing the core appeal of an idea before significant resources are committed. At Hangar 75, we use Pretotyping inside our IDEATE∞ platform to help enterprise teams test assumptions, de-risk decisions, and prioritize ideas that demonstrate true signal—not noise.

The mantra? Make sure you’re building the right “it” before you build it right.

What is Pretotyping?

Pretotyping, coined by Alberto Savoia at Google, focuses on testing the initial appeal or demand for a concept—before any real product is built. It differs from prototyping in one important way:

  • Pretotype: Fake the product to see if people care

  • Prototype: Build a working version to test how it works

Pretotyping involves ultra-low-fidelity simulations such as:

  • Landing page tests

  • Manual “concierge” services

  • Fake button tests

  • Brochures for non-existent products

  • “In-the-wild” behavior observation

It’s about validating desirability—not functionality.

Why Pretotyping Is Powerful for Corporate Innovation

In enterprise settings, ideas are often greenlit based on internal conviction, not market evidence. Pretotyping inserts a layer of evidence-based discipline at the top of the innovation funnel.

It’s particularly valuable when:

  • You have many ideas but limited build capacity

  • Internal stakeholders need fast signals to commit

  • You want to test multiple directions before investing in one

  • Customer input needs to be grounded in behavior, not just opinions

Pros of Pretotyping

  • Ultra-Fast: Tests can be deployed in hours or days

  • Cost-Effective: Minimal resources required

  • Behavior-Based: Tracks what customers do—not what they say

  • De-Risks Investment: Eliminates weak ideas early

  • Great for Internal Buy-In: Early results help unlock sponsorship

Cons of Pretotyping

  • Surface-Level Testing: Doesn’t evaluate usability or technical feasibility

  • Risk of Misinterpretation: Poorly designed tests can give false signals

  • Ethical Gray Zones: Some versions blur lines between simulation and deception

  • Requires Cultural Maturity: Some organizations resist testing “unfinished” ideas

  • Needs a Strong Hypothesis: Without clear assumptions, tests become meaningless

Illustrative Example: Testing a New Service Line in B2B Manufacturing

A global industrial equipment provider approached Hangar 75 to explore launching a digital predictive maintenance platform—a major shift from its hardware-focused business.

Rather than build an MVP, we ran a Pretotyping campaign:

  • Built a marketing site offering the proposed service

  • Targeted key buyer personas through LinkedIn

  • Tracked sign-up rates, feature interest, and CTA interactions

  • Followed up with “waitlist” emails and optional interviews

Results revealed low initial interest in the predictive dashboard—but high demand for on-demand expert consultation and SMS alerts. The team pivoted to develop a leaner, expert-led offering that aligned with real-world buyer pain points.

Pretotyping saved months of engineering and helped the client define a service people actually wanted.

Where Pretotyping Fits Within the IDEATE∞ Platform

At Hangar 75, Pretotyping is embedded into the validation layer of IDEATE∞, typically after an idea has cleared desirability scoring and before resource allocation.

IDEATE∞ supports pretotyping through:

  • Landing page generation templates

  • Hypothesis-to-test framing tools

  • AI-suggested test formats based on the idea type

  • Real-time dashboards for behavioral analytics

  • Experiment sequencing to test multiple variants in parallel

We often pair pretotyping with AI-Augmented Ideation (to generate test variants) and Lean Startup (to transition from fake to functional once validation occurs).

The Strategic Role of Pretotyping in Innovation Portfolios

Pretotyping is ideal for:

  • Prioritizing ideas before prototyping or MVP investment

  • Testing emotional and behavioral resonance

  • Exploring alternative positioning and messaging

  • Gathering real-world data to support internal pitches

  • Running portfolio-wide assumption tests at scale

It’s especially useful when the opportunity cost of building the wrong thing is high—which, in large organizations, it almost always is.

Final Thoughts: Test It Before You Build It

Pretotyping is a low-risk, high-value discipline that forces teams to ask a critical question early: “Does anyone want this?” In enterprise innovation, that clarity is priceless.

At Hangar 75, we embed Pretotyping into every innovation cycle via IDEATE∞—ensuring bold ideas are backed by behavior, not just belief.


Ready to Unlock Transformational Ideas?

This is just one of the many powerful techniques embedded within IDEATE∞, Hangar 75’s enterprise-grade ideation engine. Whether you’re launching a new product, solving complex challenges, or evolving your innovation strategy, IDEATE∞ helps you generate, enrich, and prioritize high-impact ideas—fast.

👉 Explore how IDEATE∞ can be deployed inside your organization.

Schedule a no-risk, personalized demo and discover precisely how IDEATE∞ can drive strategic advantage for your organization.

Previous
Previous

Provocation (Lateral Thinking): Disrupting Logic to Unlock Corporate Innovation

Next
Next

Lean Startup in Corporate Innovation: Speed, Learning, and the Risk of Playing It Too Safe